Elbert Smith v. Harold Clarke
HAROLD W. CLARKE |
ELBERT SMITH |
20-7498 |
October 8, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [8]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Elbert Smith. [1000843839] [20-7498] CH [Entered: 11/06/2020 03:47 PM] |
Filing 9 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Elbert Smith. [20-7498] CH [Entered: 11/06/2020 03:39 PM] |
Filing 8 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Elbert Smith. [20-7498] CH [Entered: 11/06/2020 03:38 PM] |
Filing 7 Letter - cover letter referencing IFP application and informal opening brief by Elbert Smith. [1000843825] [20-7498] CH [Entered: 11/06/2020 03:38 PM] |
Filing 6 ORDER filed deferring action on Motion to appoint/assign counsel filed by Appellant Elbert Smith [ # 5 ]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Elbert Smith. [1000841924] [20-7498] CH [Entered: 11/04/2020 10:08 AM] |
Filing 5 MOTION by Elbert Smith to appoint/assign counsel. Date and method of service: 11/03/2020 US mail. [1000841920] [20-7498] CH [Entered: 11/04/2020 10:06 AM] |
Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 7:19-cv-00523-JPJ-PMS. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case?N/A. [20-7498] CH [Entered: 10/08/2020 02:37 PM] |
Filing 3 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Elbert Smith. Informal Opening Brief due 11/02/2020. [20-7498] CH [Entered: 10/08/2020 02:34 PM] |
Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Elbert Smith - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 11/09/2020. Originating case number: 7:19-cv-00523-JPJ-PMS. Mailed to: Elbert Smith. [20-7498] CH [Entered: 10/08/2020 02:30 PM] |
Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 7:19-cv-00523-JPJ-PMS. Date notice of appeal filed: 10/07/2020. Case manager: CHalupa. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [20-7498] CH [Entered: 10/08/2020 01:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Elbert Smith v. Harold Clarke | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE | |
Represented By: | Eugene Paul Murphy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: ELBERT SMITH | |
Represented By: | Elbert Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.