Raymond Joiner v. Todd Ishee
OFFICER ORE, MS. WHITE, J. SAPPER, TODD E. ISHEE and SGT. WATSON |
RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER |
20-7519 |
October 15, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Raymond Dakim Harris Joiner for failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Joiner. [20-7519] TF [Entered: 11/19/2020 11:01 AM] |
Filing 6 COURT ORDER filed denying Motion for leave to proceed PLRA [5] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Joiner. [1000851402] [20-7519] TF [Entered: 11/19/2020 11:00 AM] |
Filing 4 (ENTRY RESTRICTED) MOTION by Raymond Dakim Harris Joiner to appoint/assign counsel. MOTION TRANSFERRED FROM DISTRICT COURT? Y. [1000838714] [20-7519] Incorrect filing.--[Edited 10/29/2020 by TF] TF [Entered: 10/29/2020 11:43 AM] |
Filing 5 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Raymond Dakim Harris Joiner. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: Yes. [20-7519] TF [Entered: 10/30/2020 10:18 AM] |
Filing 3 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Raymond Dakim Harris Joiner ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Joiner. [20-7519] TF [Entered: 10/15/2020 10:31 AM] |
Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:20-ct-03036-FL. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-7519] TF [Entered: 10/15/2020 10:05 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:20-ct-03036-FL. Case manager: TFischer. [20-7519] TF [Entered: 10/15/2020 10:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.