In re: Raymond Chestnut
| In re: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray |
| 21-1234 |
| March 4, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 FEE NOTICE issued to Raymond Edward Chestnut - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 03/19/2021 Originating case number: 4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1. Mailed to: Raymond Chestnut. [21-1234] RE [Entered: 03/04/2021 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus Originating case number: 4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1. Mailed to: Raymond Chestnut. [21-1234] RE [Entered: 03/04/2021 09:03 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1. Case manager: REdwards. [21-1234] RE [Entered: 03/04/2021 08:20 AM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Raymond Edward Chestnut. [21-1234] RE [Entered: 03/04/2021 08:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Raymond Chestnut | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray | |
| Represented By: | Raymond Edward Chestnut |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
