Jackelin De Herrera v. Merrick Garland
E.J.H.L. and JACKELIN D. LOPEZ GUINAC DE HERRERA |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General |
21-1338 |
March 29, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by John F. Stanton for Merrick B. Garland. [1000925064] [21-1338] John Stanton [Entered: 03/29/2021 04:41 PM] |
Filing 5 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record from Merrick B. Garland. Date petition for review or application filed: 03/29/2021. [ # 1 ] petition for review. Mailed to: Thomas Giles Atlanta Field Office 180 Ted Turner Drive SW Atlanta, GA 30303; Office of the Principal Legal Advisor 5701 Executive Center Drive Suite 300 Charlotte, NC 28212. Administrative Record due 05/10/2021 [21-1338] TF [Entered: 03/29/2021 04:24 PM] |
Filing 4 NOTICE ISSUED re: case caption. [21-1338] TF [Entered: 03/29/2021 04:21 PM] |
Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to Anton Lebedev - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 04/13/2021 Originating case number: A202-154-713, A202-154-714. [21-1338] TF [Entered: 03/29/2021 04:20 PM] |
Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] petition for review Originating case number: A202-154-713,A202-154-714. [21-1338] TF [Entered: 03/29/2021 04:18 PM] |
Filing 1 Petition for review of agency order filed by Jackelin Lopez Guinac De Herrera and E.J.H.L. .[1000925015] [21-1338] TF [Entered: 03/29/2021 04:09 PM] |
Immigration Petition for Review case docketed. Originating case number: A202-154-713,A202-154-714. Case manager: TFischer. [21-1338] TF [Entered: 03/29/2021 04:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.