US v. 8.929 Acres of Land in Arlington County, Virginia
Defendant: WASHINGTON GAS, VERIZON VIRGINIA, LLC, VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK SERVICES INC., FIBERLIGHT, LLC, UNKNOWN OWNERS, DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER and JONES UTILITIES CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Defendant / Appellant: 8.929 ACRES OF LAND IN ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA and ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 21-1352
Filed: April 1, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 1, 2022 Summary US v. 8.929 Acres of Land in Arlington County, Virginia

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2021 Filing 14 Corrected ORDER filed, Opening brief and appendix due 07/16/2021. Response brief due 08/27/2021. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties.. [1000952819] [21-1352] RHS [Entered: 05/17/2021 12:37 PM]
May 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER filed . Opening brief and appendix due 08/27/2021. Response brief due 09/27/2021. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties. [1000951489] [21-1352] RHS [Entered: 05/13/2021 10:52 AM]
May 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER filed extending filing time for opening brief and appendix until 7/16/21. Opening brief and appendix due 07/16/2021. Response brief due 08/16/2021. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties. [1000949553] [21-1352] RHS [Entered: 05/10/2021 04:49 PM]
May 3, 2021 Filing 11 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Gus B. Bauman for Arlington County, Virginia. [1000945019] [21-1352] Gus Bauman [Entered: 05/03/2021 08:53 PM]
May 3, 2021 Filing 10 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Allen M. Brabender for US. [1000945015] [21-1352] Allen Brabender [Entered: 05/03/2021 08:24 PM]
May 3, 2021 Filing 9 Initial mediation conference scheduled. [21-1352] LHP [Entered: 05/03/2021 02:20 PM]
April 27, 2021 Filing 8 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Stephen A MacIsaac for Arlington County, Virginia. [1000941574] [21-1352] Stephen MacIsaac [Entered: 04/27/2021 04:41 PM]
April 27, 2021 Filing 7 BRIEFING ORDER filed.. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Opening Brief and Appendix due 06/07/2021. Response Brief due 07/06/2021 [21-1352] RHS [Entered: 04/27/2021 04:27 PM]
April 27, 2021 Filing 6 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Arlington County, Virginia. [21-1352] James Auslander [Entered: 04/27/2021 04:09 PM]
April 27, 2021 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Arlington County, Virginia. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000941500] [21-1352] James Auslander [Entered: 04/27/2021 04:06 PM]
April 27, 2021 Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by James M. Auslander for Arlington County, Virginia. [1000941493] [21-1352] James Auslander [Entered: 04/27/2021 04:03 PM]
April 27, 2021 Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by MinhChau Corr for Arlington County, Virginia. [1000941266] [21-1352] MinhChau Corr [Entered: 04/27/2021 01:31 PM]
April 13, 2021 Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case Originating case number: 1:20-cv-00667-LMB-JFA.. [21-1352] RHS [Entered: 04/13/2021 03:56 PM]
April 1, 2021 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:20-cv-00667-LMB-JFA. Case manager: RSewell. [21-1352] RHS [Entered: 04/01/2021 10:27 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. 8.929 Acres of Land in Arlington County, Virginia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: 8.929 ACRES OF LAND IN ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Represented By: Stephen Alexander MacIsaac
Represented By: MinhChau Nguyen Corr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Represented By: Stephen Alexander MacIsaac
Represented By: MinhChau Nguyen Corr
Represented By: James Michael Auslander
Represented By: Gus Bloch Bauman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WASHINGTON GAS
Represented By: Godfrey Thadeus Pinn Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VERIZON VIRGINIA, LLC
Represented By: Richard D. Holzheimer Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK SERVICES INC.
Represented By: Richard D. Holzheimer Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FIBERLIGHT, LLC
Represented By: Jessica Ashley Glajch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN OWNERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
Represented By: Godfrey Thadeus Pinn Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JONES UTILITIES CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Represented By: Samuel J. Banks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Eugene N. Hansen
Represented By: Gerard John Mene
Represented By: Allen M. Brabender Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?