George Mims v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
| USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY |
| CECILIA MIMS and GEORGE MIMS |
| 21-1654 |
| June 8, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| George Mims v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Opening Brief and Appendix due 08/30/2021. Response Brief due 09/27/2021. [21-1654] TW [Entered: 07/19/2021 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 15 COURT ORDER filed denying motion to certify question to state court [ # 9 ]. Copies to all parties. [1000987972] [21-1654] TW [Entered: 07/19/2021 11:24 AM] |
Filing 14
ORDER filed granting motion to suspend [ # 13 ]. Copies to all parties. [1000987442] [21-1654] MR [Entered: 07/16/2021 02:16 PM]
|
| Filing 13 MOTION by Cecilia Mims and George Mims to suspend Briefing Pending Ruling on Motion for Certification to the South Carolina Supreme Court. Date and method of service: 07/16/2021 ecf. [1000987350] [21-1654] Thomas Rode [Entered: 07/16/2021 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 12 REPLY by Cecilia Mims and George Mims to response [ # 11 ].. [21-1654] Thomas Rode [Entered: 07/13/2021 12:42 PM] |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE/ANSWER by USAA Casualty Insurance Company to notice requesting response [ # 10 ], Motion [ # 9 ]. Nature of response: in opposition. [21-1654] John Murphy [Entered: 07/08/2021 12:23 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE ISSUED to USAA Casualty Insurance Company requesting response to Motion to certify question to state court [ # 9 ]. Response due 07/08/2021. [1000975552]. [21-1654] RE [Entered: 06/28/2021 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Cecilia Mims and George Mims for certification of question to state court. Date and method of service: 06/28/2021 ecf. [1000975499] [21-1654] Thomas Rode [Entered: 06/28/2021 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 8 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Cecilia Mims and George Mims. [21-1654] Thomas Rode [Entered: 06/21/2021 07:50 AM] |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Cecilia Mims and George Mims. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000971389] [21-1654] Thomas Rode [Entered: 06/21/2021 07:49 AM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Thomas J. Rode for Cecilia Mims and George Mims. [1000971384] [21-1654] Thomas Rode [Entered: 06/21/2021 07:46 AM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by USAA Casualty Insurance Company. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? Yes [1000967616] [21-1654] John Murphy [Entered: 06/11/2021 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by J.R. Murphy for USAA Casualty Insurance Company. [1000967597] [21-1654] John Murphy [Entered: 06/11/2021 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Andrew Brittain and Thomas Rode. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Opening Brief and Appendix due 07/19/2021. Response Brief due 08/17/2021 [21-1654] RE [Entered: 06/08/2021 09:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 4:19-cv-00765-JD. Mailed to: Andrew Brittain and Thomas Rode. [21-1654] RE [Entered: 06/08/2021 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 4:19-cv-00765-JD. Case manager: REdwards. [21-1654] RE [Entered: 06/08/2021 08:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
