Maria Romero-Ramirez v. Merrick Garland
| MARIA LISSET ROMERO-RAMIREZ and A.L.V. |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND |
| 21-1665 |
| June 10, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE ISSUED re: case caption. [21-1665] CH [Entered: 06/10/2021 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 6 Amended petition for review of agency order filed by A.L.V. and Maria Lisset Romero-Ramirez [1000967082]. [21-1665]--[Edited 06/10/2021 by CH--modify docket text] CH [Entered: 06/10/2021 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Marie Vanderbilt Robinson for Merrick B. Garland. [1000967074] [21-1665] Marie Robinson [Entered: 06/10/2021 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record from Merrick B. Garland. Date petition for review or application filed: 06/10/2021. [ # 2 ] petition for review. Administrative Record due 07/20/2021. [21-1665] CH [Entered: 06/10/2021 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] petition for review. Originating case number: A209-342-063. [21-1665] CH [Entered: 06/10/2021 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for review of agency order filed by Maria Lisset Romero-Ramirez. [1000967012] [21-1665] CH [Entered: 06/10/2021 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 1 Electronic filing fee paid. Filing Fee: $500.00. Receipt Number: A04-70719-236. [21-1665] CH [Entered: 06/10/2021 11:00 AM] |
| Immigration Petition for Review case docketed. Originating case number: A209-342-063. Case manager: CHalupa. [21-1665] CH [Entered: 06/10/2021 10:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.