Earl Cook v. UPS
| EARL COOK |
| UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. |
| 21-1693 |
| June 21, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER filed extending briefing order deadlines. Opening brief and appendix due 09/09/2021. Response brief due 10/12/2021. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties. [1000984803] [21-1693] RE [Entered: 07/13/2021 11:50 AM]
|
| Filing 12 Initial mediation conference scheduled. [21-1693] MRB [Entered: 07/06/2021 09:29 AM] |
| Filing 11 (ENTRY RESTRICTED) DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by UPS. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? Yes. --[Edited 07/01/2021 by RE-filed in DE 7] [1000978654] [21-1693] Michael Victorian [Entered: 07/01/2021 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Michael Burnett Victorian for UPS. [1000978653] [21-1693] Michael Victorian [Entered: 07/01/2021 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 9 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Opening Brief and Appendix due 08/10/2021. Response Brief due 09/09/2021 [21-1693] RE [Entered: 07/01/2021 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 8 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Earl Cook. [21-1693] Todd Combs [Entered: 07/01/2021 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Earl Cook. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000978404] [21-1693] Todd Combs [Entered: 07/01/2021 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Todd J Combs for Earl Cook. [1000978402] [21-1693] Todd Combs [Entered: 07/01/2021 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by J. Day Peake III for UPS. [1000977594] [21-1693] John Peake [Entered: 06/30/2021 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by UPS. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? Yes [1000977588] [21-1693] Nathan Huff [Entered: 06/30/2021 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Nathan A. Huff for UPS. [1000977577] [21-1693] Nathan Huff [Entered: 06/30/2021 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 5:20-cv-00042-KDB-DSC. Mailed to: Day Peake and Michael Victorian. [21-1693] RE [Entered: 06/21/2021 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:20-cv-00042-KDB-DSC. Case manager: REdwards. [21-1693] RE [Entered: 06/21/2021 01:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Earl Cook v. UPS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: EARL COOK | |
| Represented By: | Todd J. Combs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Michael Burnett Victorian |
| Represented By: | Nathan A. Huff |
| Represented By: | J. Day Peake III |
| Represented By: | John Day Peake III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
