Dax Johnson v. Michael Santomassimo
Defendant / Appellee: WELLS FARGO BANK and MICHAEL SANTOMASSIMO, a man acting as CFO for Wells Fargo Bank
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAX JOHNSON
Case Number: 21-1720
Filed: June 28, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 19, 2021 Dax Johnson v. Michael Santomassimo

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2021 Filing 11 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Dax Johnson. [21-1720] AW [Entered: 07/27/2021 11:04 AM]
July 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [9] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Johnson. [1000990550] [21-1720] AW [Entered: 07/22/2021 04:09 PM]
July 22, 2021 Filing 9 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Dax Johnson. [21-1720] AW [Entered: 07/22/2021 04:04 PM]
July 8, 2021 Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Michael Santomassimo. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000982460] [21-1720] Daniel Herbst [Entered: 07/08/2021 01:05 PM]
July 8, 2021 Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wells Fargo Bank. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? Yes [1000982449] [21-1720] Daniel Herbst [Entered: 07/08/2021 12:48 PM]
July 8, 2021 Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Daniel Z. Herbst for Michael Santomassimo and Wells Fargo Bank. [1000982436] [21-1720] Daniel Herbst [Entered: 07/08/2021 12:34 PM]
June 30, 2021 Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:21-cv-00766-RDB. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [21-1720] AW [Entered: 06/30/2021 08:21 AM]
June 28, 2021 Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 07/12/2021. [21-1720] AW [Entered: 06/28/2021 03:29 PM]
June 28, 2021 Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to Dax Johnson - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 07/28/2021 Originating case number: 1:21-cv-00766-RDB. Mailed to: Johnson. [21-1720] AW [Entered: 06/28/2021 03:28 PM]
June 28, 2021 Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Johnson. Informal Opening Brief due 07/22/2021 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [21-1720] AW [Entered: 06/28/2021 03:27 PM]
June 28, 2021 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:21-cv-00766-RDB. Case manager: AWalker. [21-1720] AW [Entered: 06/28/2021 03:26 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dax Johnson v. Michael Santomassimo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WELLS FARGO BANK
Represented By: Daniel Zev Herbst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MICHAEL SANTOMASSIMO, a man acting as CFO for Wells Fargo Bank
Represented By: Daniel Zev Herbst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DAX JOHNSON
Represented By: Dax Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?