In re: William Davis, Jr.
| In re: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR. |
| 21-1770 |
| July 14, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 FEE NOTICE issued to William Scott Davis, Jr. - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 07/30/2021. Originating case number: 5:14-cr-00240-BR-1. Mailed to: William Davis, Jr. [21-1770] CB [Entered: 07/15/2021 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docket correction requested from William Scott Davis, Jr. Mailed to: William Davis, Jr. [21-1770] CB [Entered: 07/15/2021 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus. Originating case number: 5:14-cr-00240-BR-1. Mailed to: William Davis, Jr. [21-1770] CB [Entered: 07/15/2021 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:14-cr-00240-BR-1. Case manager: CBennett. [21-1770] CB [Entered: 07/14/2021 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by William Scott Davis, Jr. [21-1770] CB [Entered: 07/14/2021 04:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: William Davis, Jr. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR. | |
| Represented By: | William Scott Davis Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
