In re: David Annarelli
| In re: DAVID JOSEPH ANNARELLI |
| 21-1791 |
| July 23, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ David Joseph Annarelli ]. Fee due to Court of Appeals or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days.. [21-1791] RHS [Entered: 07/23/2021 09:18 AM] |
| Filing 4 Docket correction requested from David Joseph Annarelli.. [21-1791] RHS [Entered: 07/23/2021 09:11 AM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for extraordinary writ under FRAP 21 Originating case number: 7:20-cv-00025-EKD-JCH. [21-1791] RHS [Entered: 07/23/2021 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:20-cv-00025-EKD-JCH. Case manager: RSewell. [21-1791] RHS [Entered: 07/23/2021 09:01 AM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for extraordinary writ under FRAP 21 filed by David Joseph Annarelli. [21-1791] RHS [Entered: 07/23/2021 09:04 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: David Annarelli | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: DAVID JOSEPH ANNARELLI | |
| Represented By: | David Joseph Annarelli |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
