West Virginia CWP Fund v. DOWCP
| WEST VIRGINIA CWP FUND, as carrier for Justin Construction Company |
| DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and JESSE L. ATHEY |
| 21-1903 |
| August 18, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Jesse L. Athey. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001006222] [21-1903] Brad Austin [Entered: 08/18/2021 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Brad A. Austin for Jesse L. Athey. [1001006221] [21-1903] Brad Austin [Entered: 08/18/2021 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record from DOWCP. Date petition for review or application filed: 08/18/2021. [ # 3 ] petition for review. Mailed to: Benefits Review Board, ATTN: Clerk of the Board, 200 Constitution Ave., N.W., Room S-5220, Washington, D.C. 20210. Administrative Record due 09/27/2021 [21-1903] RJL [Entered: 08/18/2021 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 20-0345-BLA. [21-1903] RJL [Entered: 08/18/2021 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 3 Petition for review of agency order filed by West Virginia CWP Fund .[1001006170] [21-1903] RJL [Entered: 08/18/2021 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 Electronic filing fee paid. Filing Fee: $500.00. Receipt Number: A04-70986-743. [21-1903] RJL [Entered: 08/18/2021 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 20-0345-BLA. Case manager: Rachel Lee. [21-1903] RJL [Entered: 08/18/2021 03:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
