Rudolph Whitehurst v. Teresa Bryant
Plaintiff / Appellant: RUDOLPH BENJAMIN LAVARN WHITEHURST
Defendant / Appellee: TERESA DELOATCH BRYANT
Case Number: 21-1982
Filed: September 8, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 12, 2022 Rudolph Whitehurst v. Teresa Bryant

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2021 Filing 10 INFORMAL RESPONSE BRIEF by Teresa DeLoatch Bryant. [21-1982] Christina Banfield [Entered: 10/26/2021 11:02 AM]
October 15, 2021 Filing 9 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Rudolph Benjamin Lavarn Whitehurst. [21-1982] AB [Entered: 10/15/2021 04:00 PM]
October 12, 2021 Filing 8 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Rudolph Benjamin Lavarn Whitehurst re: failure to satisfy fee and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Rudolph Benjamin Lavarn Whitehurst 2320-A Saddleback Drive Winterville, NC 28590. [21-1982] AB [Entered: 10/12/2021 12:18 PM]
October 6, 2021 Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Teresa DeLoatch Bryant. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001036546] [21-1982] Christina Banfield [Entered: 10/06/2021 11:20 AM]
October 6, 2021 Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Christina Jansen Banfield for Teresa DeLoatch Bryant. [1001036541] [21-1982] Christina Banfield [Entered: 10/06/2021 11:18 AM]
October 4, 2021 Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. State court record (paper) requested? N/A. [21-1982] AB [Entered: 10/04/2021 08:59 PM]
September 8, 2021 Filing 4 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Rudolph Benjamin Lavarn Whitehurst 2320-A Saddleback Drive Winterville, NC 28590. Informal Opening Brief due 10/04/2021. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [21-1982] AB [Entered: 09/08/2021 02:22 PM]
September 8, 2021 Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to Rudolph Benjamin Lavarn Whitehurst - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 10/08/2021. Originating case number: 4:20-cv-00179-M. Mailed to: Rudolph Benjamin Lavarn Whitehurst 2320-A Saddleback Drive Winterville, NC 28590. [21-1982] AB [Entered: 09/08/2021 02:20 PM]
September 8, 2021 Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 4:20-cv-00179-M. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [21-1982] AB [Entered: 09/08/2021 02:20 PM]
September 8, 2021 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 4:20-cv-00179-M. Case manager: ABrownlee. [21-1982] AB [Entered: 09/08/2021 02:18 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Rudolph Whitehurst v. Teresa Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RUDOLPH BENJAMIN LAVARN WHITEHURST
Represented By: Rudolph Benjamin Lavarn Whitehurst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TERESA DELOATCH BRYANT
Represented By: Christina Jansen Banfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?