Azucena Zamorano Aleman v. City of Charlotte
| COURTNEY SUGGS, individually and officially |
| AZUCENA ZAMORANO ALEMAN, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of RUBIN GALINDO CHAVEZ |
| CITY OF CHARLOTTE and DAVID GUERRA, individually and officially |
| 21-2223 |
| October 28, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Azucena Zamorano Aleman v. City of Charlotte
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by City of Charlotte. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001064103] [21-2223] Clarence Matherson [Entered: 11/23/2021 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Clarence Matherson, Jr. for City of Charlotte. [1001064096] [21-2223] Clarence Matherson [Entered: 11/23/2021 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 13 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by David Guerra. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001064041] [21-2223] Lori Keeton [Entered: 11/23/2021 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 12 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Lori R. Keeton for David Guerra. [1001064034] [21-2223] Lori Keeton [Entered: 11/23/2021 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 11 DOCKETING FORMS FOLLOW-UP NOTICE ISSUED to City of Charlotte and David Guerra re: filing of appearance and disclosure forms. All forms due 11/22/2021. [21-2223] MEB [Entered: 11/17/2021 02:43 PM] |
Filing 10
ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 9 ]. Number of days granted: 30. Opening brief and appendix due 01/19/2022. Response brief due 02/18/2022. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties. [1001059797] [21-2223] MEB [Entered: 11/16/2021 05:01 PM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION by Azucena Zamorano Aleman to extend filing time for opening brief and appendix until January 19, 2022.. Date and method of service: 11/16/2021 ecf. [1001059657] [21-2223] S. Largess [Entered: 11/16/2021 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 8 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Opening Brief and Appendix due 12/20/2021. Response Brief due 01/19/2022. [21-2223] MEB [Entered: 11/09/2021 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Bradley W. Butler for Azucena Zamorano Aleman. [1001055933] [21-2223] Bradley Butler [Entered: 11/09/2021 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Brian Hochman for Azucena Zamorano Aleman. [1001055931] [21-2223] Brian Hochman [Entered: 11/09/2021 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Azucena Zamorano Aleman. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001055168] [21-2223] S. Largess [Entered: 11/08/2021 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 4 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Azucena Zamorano Aleman. [21-2223] S. Largess [Entered: 11/08/2021 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by S. Luke Largess for Azucena Zamorano Aleman. [1001055165] [21-2223] S. Largess [Entered: 11/08/2021 04:13 PM] |
|
Filing 2
DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 3:19-cv-00491-RJC-DCK. Mailed to: Bradley Watkins Butler and Brian R. Hochman at BUTLER, QUINN & HOCHMAN, PLLC, Suite 700, 4801 East Independence Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28212. [21-2223] MEB [Entered: 10/28/2021 11:16 AM]
|
|
Filing 1
Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:19-cv-00491-RJC-DCK. Case manager: MBeall. [21-2223] MEB [Entered: 10/28/2021 11:06 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
