In re: Matthew Faison
In re: MATTHEW JAMES FAISON |
21-2242 |
November 2, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Docket correction requested from Matthew James Faison. Mailed to: Matthew Faison. [21-2242] RE [Entered: 11/02/2021 09:14 AM] |
Filing 4 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Matthew James Faison ]. Fee due to Court of Appeals or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Matthew Faison. [21-2242] RE [Entered: 11/02/2021 09:13 AM] |
Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus Originating case number: 7:11-cv-00429-MFU. Mailed to: Matthew Faison. [21-2242] RE [Entered: 11/02/2021 09:08 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:11-cv-00429-MFU. Case manager: REdwards. [21-2242] RE [Entered: 11/02/2021 09:05 AM] |
Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Matthew James Faison. [21-2242] RE [Entered: 11/02/2021 09:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Matthew Faison | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: MATTHEW JAMES FAISON | |
Represented By: | Matthew James Faison |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.