In re: Curtis Richardson
In re: CURTIS RICHARDSON, a/k/a Curtis D. Richardson, a/k/a Curtis Dale Richardson |
21-2268 |
November 10, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Curtis Richardson ]. Fee due to Court of Appeals or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Curtis Richardson. [21-2268] CH [Entered: 11/10/2021 05:07 PM] |
Filing 4 Docket correction requested from Curtis Richardson. Mailed to: Curtis Richardson. [21-2268] CH [Entered: 11/10/2021 05:04 PM] |
Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus. Originating case number: 4:16-cv-00835-JD-TER. Mailed to: Curtis Richardson. [21-2268] CH [Entered: 11/10/2021 05:02 PM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 4:16-cv-00835-JD-TER. Case manager: CHalupa. [21-2268] CH [Entered: 11/10/2021 04:57 PM] |
Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Curtis Richardson. [21-2268] CH [Entered: 11/10/2021 04:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Curtis Richardson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: CURTIS RICHARDSON, a/k/a Curtis D. Richardson, a/k/a Curtis Dale Richardson | |
Represented By: | Curtis Richardson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.