Neysa Call v. Sethuraman Panchanathan
Plaintiff / Appellant: NEYSA CALL
Defendant / Appellee: DR. SETHURAMAN PANCHANATHAN, Director, National Science Foundation
Case Number: 21-2291
Filed: November 17, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER filed extending briefing order deadlines. Opening brief and appendix due 02/09/2022. Response brief due 03/11/2022. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties. [1001086763] [21-2291] NRS [Entered: 01/05/2022 03:35 PM]
December 9, 2021 Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Neysa Call. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001072318] [21-2291] Ellen Renaud [Entered: 12/09/2021 12:37 PM]
December 9, 2021 Filing 9 DOCKETING FORMS FOLLOW-UP NOTICE ISSUED to Neysa Call re: filing of disclosure form Disclosure statement due from Neysa Call on 12/13/2021. [1001072207] [21-2291] NRS [Entered: 12/09/2021 10:53 AM]
December 2, 2021 Filing 8 Initial mediation conference scheduled. [1001068575] [21-2291] LHP [Entered: 12/02/2021 09:25 AM]
December 1, 2021 Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Rebecca S. Levenson for Dr. Sethuraman Panchanathan. [1001067818] [21-2291] Rebecca Levenson [Entered: 12/01/2021 09:34 AM]
December 1, 2021 Filing 6 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. [1001067817] Opening Brief and Appendix due 01/10/2022. Response Brief due 02/09/2022. [21-2291] NRS [Entered: 12/01/2021 09:34 AM]
November 30, 2021 Filing 5 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Neysa Call. [1001067600] [21-2291] Ellen Renaud [Entered: 11/30/2021 04:49 PM]
November 30, 2021 Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Ellen K. Renaud for Neysa Call. [1001067575] [21-2291] Ellen Renaud [Entered: 11/30/2021 04:29 PM]
November 17, 2021 Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Hugham Chan for Dr. Sethuraman Panchanathan. [1001060644] [21-2291] Hugham Chan [Entered: 11/17/2021 05:51 PM]
November 17, 2021 Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 1:20-cv-00260-TSE-IDD. [21-2291] NRS [Entered: 11/17/2021 11:40 AM]
November 17, 2021 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:20-cv-00260-TSE-IDD. Case manager: NaeemahSims. [21-2291] NRS [Entered: 11/17/2021 11:34 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Neysa Call v. Sethuraman Panchanathan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: NEYSA CALL
Represented By: Ellen Kyriacou Renaud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DR. SETHURAMAN PANCHANATHAN, Director, National Science Foundation
Represented By: Hugham Chan
Represented By: Rebecca Sara Levenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?