Catherine Boso v. Commissioner of Social Security
| CATHERINE BOSO |
| COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
| 21-2321 |
| November 29, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Rule 42(b) mandate issued. Originating case number: 6:20-cv-02792-KFM. [1001083558] [21-2321] MEB [Entered: 12/30/2021 03:50 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER filed granting motion to dismiss appeal [ # 8 ], dismissing appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b). [9] Copies to all parties. [1001083553] [21-2321] MEB [Entered: 12/30/2021 03:48 PM]
|
| Filing 8 MOTION by Catherine Boso to dismiss appeal [8]. Date and method of service: 12/29/2021 ecf. [1001082597] [21-2321] William Mayes [Entered: 12/29/2021 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 7 DOCKETING FORMS FOLLOW-UP NOTICE ISSUED to Catherine Boso re: filing of docketing statement and appearance form. Docketing statement due from Catherine Boso on 01/03/2022. Appearance form due on 01/03/2022 from William Daniel Mayes. [1001080158] [21-2321] MEB [Entered: 12/22/2021 05:38 PM] |
| Filing 6 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 6:20-cv-02792-KFM. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001069624] [21-2321] MEB [Entered: 12/03/2021 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Opening Brief and Appendix due 01/12/2022. Response Brief due 02/11/2022. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. [1001069608] [21-2321] MEB [Entered: 12/03/2021 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 4 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD in electronic format by Commissioner of Social Security. Method of service: ECF service on counsel. [1001069021] [21-2321] Maija DiDomenico [Entered: 12/02/2021 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Maija DiDomenico for Commissioner of Social Security. [1001068981] [21-2321] Maija DiDomenico [Entered: 12/02/2021 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD requested (counseled cases) . Was administrative record filed in electronic form in district court? Yes. Administrative Record (Social Security) due 12/13/2021. [21-2321] MEB [Entered: 11/29/2021 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1001065642-2 ] social security case. Originating case number: 6:20-cv-02792-KFM. [21-2321] MEB [Entered: 11/29/2021 08:54 AM] |
| Social Security case docketed. Originating case number: 6:20-cv-02792-KFM. Date notice of appeal filed: 11/22/2021. Case manager: MBeall. [21-2321] MEB [Entered: 11/29/2021 08:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Catherine Boso v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: CATHERINE BOSO | |
| Represented By: | William Daniel Mayes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY | |
| Represented By: | Marshall Prince II |
| Represented By: | Maija DiDomenico Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
