Hayden Teeter v. Loomis Armored US
Plaintiff / Appellant: HAYDEN TEETER
Defendant / Appellee: LOOMIS ARMORED US
Case Number: 21-2426
Filed: December 28, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2022 Filing 12 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. [1001113658] Opening Brief and Appendix due 03/30/2022. Response Brief due 04/29/2022. [21-2426] NRS [Entered: 02/18/2022 04:26 PM]
January 20, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE ISSUED to Edward Henderson Williams, II re: change of address. [1001095735] [21-2426] NRS [Entered: 01/20/2022 05:20 PM]
January 20, 2022 Filing 10 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Kirk J. Angel for Hayden Teeter. [1001095685] [21-2426] Kirk Angel [Entered: 01/20/2022 04:28 PM]
January 12, 2022 Filing 9 Initial mediation conference scheduled. [1001091141] [21-2426] LHP [Entered: 01/12/2022 01:34 PM]
January 10, 2022 Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Loomis Armored US. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? Yes [1001089391] [21-2426] Stephen Dellinger [Entered: 01/10/2022 03:00 PM]
January 10, 2022 Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL for Loomis Armored US. [1001089389] [21-2426] Stephen Dellinger [Entered: 01/10/2022 02:59 PM]
January 10, 2022 Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT ORDER ACKNOWLEDGMENT filed for Risa Kramer. Identify by proceeding and date all transcript ordered from this court reporter: Status Hearing 10/06/2021. Names of all parties ordering transcript from this reporter: Hayden Teeter. Originating case number: 7:20-cv-00079-M. [1001089241] Transcript due from Risa Kramer, Official Court Reporter on 03/18/2022. [21-2426] NRS [Entered: 01/10/2022 01:29 PM]
January 10, 2022 Filing 5 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Hayden Teeter.. [1001089196] [21-2426] Edward Williams [Entered: 01/10/2022 01:01 PM]
January 10, 2022 Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Hayden Teeter. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001089193] [21-2426] Edward Williams [Entered: 01/10/2022 12:59 PM]
January 10, 2022 Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Edward H Williams II for Hayden Teeter. [1001089190] [21-2426] Edward Williams [Entered: 01/10/2022 12:56 PM]
December 28, 2021 Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 7:20-cv-00079-M. [1001081385] [21-2426] NRS [Entered: 12/28/2021 09:20 AM]
December 28, 2021 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:20-cv-00079-M. Case manager: NaeemahSims. [1001081374] [21-2426] NRS [Entered: 12/28/2021 09:18 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Hayden Teeter v. Loomis Armored US
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: HAYDEN TEETER
Represented By: Kirk J. Angel
Represented By: Edward Henderson Williams II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LOOMIS ARMORED US
Represented By: Stephen Douglas Dellinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?