US v. Rodney Goodwin
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| RODNEY CHRISTOPHER GOODWIN, a/k/a Rah Rah |
| 21-4456 |
| September 1, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Mr. Samuel John Randall, IV - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 09/16/2021 Originating case number: 1:20-cr-00203-WO-3. [21-4456] RE [Entered: 09/01/2021 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. Originating case number: 1:20-cr-00203-WO-3. Date notice of appeal filed: 08/17/2021. Case manager: REdwards. [21-4456] RE [Entered: 09/01/2021 11:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. Rodney Goodwin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Graham Tod Green |
| Represented By: | Margaret McCall Reece |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: RODNEY CHRISTOPHER GOODWIN, a/k/a Rah Rah | |
| Represented By: | Samuel John Randall IV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.