Edward Bell v. Frank Bishop, Jr.
| THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND and FRANK B. BISHOP, JR. |
| EDWARD HALL BELL |
| 21-6068 |
| January 13, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 7 ] Number of days granted: 30. Informal Opening Brief due 04/05/2021. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Bell. [1000906695] [21-6068] TF [Entered: 02/26/2021 12:30 PM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION by Edward Hall Bell to extend filing time for informal opening brief. [1000906692] [21-6068] TF [Entered: 02/26/2021 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 6 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Edward Hall Bell for failure to file informal brief. Mailed to: Bell. [21-6068] TF [Entered: 02/17/2021 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 5 Letter by Edward Hall Bell . [1000897269] [21-6068] TF [Entered: 02/10/2021 01:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 8:16-cv-01990-PJM. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? No. State court paper record requested in 2254 case?N/A [21-6068] TF [Entered: 01/15/2021 08:35 AM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 01/27/2021. [21-6068] TF [Entered: 01/13/2021 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Bell. Informal Opening Brief due 02/08/2021 [21-6068] TF [Entered: 01/13/2021 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 8:16-cv-01990-PJM. Date notice of appeal filed: 01/12/2021. Case manager: TFischer. Did district court rule on COA? Yes (dn). [21-6068] TF [Entered: 01/13/2021 10:26 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
