Raoul Lafond v. Richard Glaser, Jr.
| RICHARD S. GLASER, JR., LYNNE P. KLAUER, WALTER C. HOLTON, JR. and CLIFTON THOMAS BARRETT |
| RAOUL LAFOND |
| 21-6177 |
| February 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Raoul Lafond v. Richard Glaser, Jr. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER filed granting Motion for leave to proceed PLRA [4] Fee Amount: $505. Name and Prisoner Number: Raoul Lafond, 18624-057. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Raoul Lafond. [1000908957] [21-6177] JHM [Entered: 03/03/2021 08:00 AM]
|
| Filing 6 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:20-cv-00557-CCE-JEP. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [21-6177] JHM [Entered: 03/02/2021 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 03/15/2021. [21-6177] JHM [Entered: 03/01/2021 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Raoul Lafond. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: Yes. [21-6177] JHM [Entered: 02/17/2021 08:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Raoul Lafond. [21-6177] JHM [Entered: 02/17/2021 08:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Raoul Lafond ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Raoul Lafond. [21-6177] JHM [Entered: 02/02/2021 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:20-cv-00557-CCE-JEP. Case manager: JMoore. [21-6177] JHM [Entered: 02/02/2021 03:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
