Edward Nellson v. John Doe
| JOHN DOE, Warden of USP Hazelton, LEIGH BIRD, JOHN DOE, SHU Lt at USP Hazelton and GREGORY MIMS |
| EDWARD NELLSON |
| 21-6206 |
| February 10, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER filed sealing joint appendix volume number II. Copies to all parties. [1000929192] [21-6206] AW [Entered: 04/06/2021 09:39 AM]
|
| Filing 15 BRIEF by Edward Nellson in electronic and paper format. Type of Brief: OPENING. [1000928974] [21-6206] Mario Williams [Entered: 04/05/2021 07:27 PM] |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF CONFIDENTIALITY (Local Rule 25(c)) by Edward Nellson. Sealing Required: Yes. Description of document referenced by certificate: Certain Exhibits to Amended Complaint; Exhibit 2 to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss/Motion for Summary Judgment. [21-6206] Mario Williams [Entered: 04/05/2021 07:26 PM] |
| Filing 13 SEALED JOINT APPENDIX VOLUME(S) (court access only) (electronic & paper form) by Edward Nellson . Digital media exhibit volume? No. Filed Ex parte: N. [21-6206] Mario Williams [Entered: 04/05/2021 07:24 PM] |
| Filing 12 JOINT APPENDIX (electronic and paper form) by Edward Nellson. Digital media exhibit volume? No. [1000928971] [21-6206] Mario Williams [Entered: 04/05/2021 07:23 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 10 ] Number of days granted: 14. Opening brief and appendix due 04/05/2021. Response brief due 05/05/2021. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties. [1000920944] [21-6206] AW [Entered: 03/23/2021 08:59 AM]
|
| Filing 10 MOTION by Edward Nellson to extend filing time for opening brief and appendix until 4/5/2021.. Date and method of service: 03/22/2021 ecf. [1000920666] [21-6206] Mario Williams [Entered: 03/22/2021 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Maximillian F. Nogay for Leigh Bird, John Doe and Gregory Mims. [1000905592] [21-6206] Maximillian Nogay [Entered: 02/25/2021 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Christopher J. Prezioso for Leigh Bird, John Doe and Gregory Mims. [1000905278] [21-6206] Christopher Prezioso [Entered: 02/24/2021 09:11 PM] |
| Filing 7 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Edward Nellson. [21-6206] Mario Williams [Entered: 02/24/2021 05:48 PM] |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Edward Nellson. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000905260] [21-6206] Mario Williams [Entered: 02/24/2021 05:47 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Dallas LePierre for Edward Nellson. [1000905258] [21-6206] Mario Williams [Entered: 02/24/2021 05:46 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Mario B. Williams for Edward Nellson. [1000905254] [21-6206] Mario Williams [Entered: 02/24/2021 05:45 PM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Opening Brief and Appendix due 03/22/2021. Response Brief due 04/21/2021 [21-6206] AW [Entered: 02/10/2021 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 5:20-cv-00112-JPB-JPM. [21-6206] AW [Entered: 02/10/2021 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:20-cv-00112-JPB-JPM. Case manager: AWalker. [21-6206] AW [Entered: 02/10/2021 04:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
