Michael Braxton v. Warden of Kershaw Correctional
Respondent: SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN OF KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL T. BRAXTON
Case Number: 21-6264
Filed: February 23, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 21, 2021 Michael Braxton v. Warden of Kershaw Correctional

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER filed updating informal briefing order deadlines. Informal Opening Brief due 04/23/2021. Copies to all parties. [1000927191] [21-6264] CT [Entered: 04/01/2021 10:37 AM]
March 25, 2021 Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. State court record (paper) requested? N/A. [21-6264] CT [Entered: 03/25/2021 10:25 AM]
March 22, 2021 Filing 8 Returned mail received from Michael T. Braxton re [ # 2 ] briefing order. What action was taken to correct address and re-serve document? updated address; resending briefing order, updating deadlines via order extending [1000927184] [21-6264] CT [Entered: 04/01/2021 10:33 AM]
March 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [4] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: M. Braxton. [1000909079] [21-6264] CT [Entered: 03/03/2021 09:39 AM]
March 3, 2021 Filing 4 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) transferred to appeals court by district court by Michael T. Braxton. [21-6264] CT [Entered: 03/03/2021 09:37 AM]
March 3, 2021 Filing 3 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 8:20-cv-03168-HMH. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case? No. [21-6264] CT [Entered: 03/03/2021 09:34 AM]
February 23, 2021 Filing 2 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Informal Opening Brief due 03/19/2021 [21-6264] CT [Entered: 02/23/2021 11:30 AM]
February 23, 2021 Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 8:20-cv-03168-HMH. Date notice of appeal filed: 02/22/2021. Case manager: CathyHerb. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [21-6264] CT [Entered: 02/23/2021 10:05 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael Braxton v. Warden of Kershaw Correctional
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: WARDEN OF KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Represented By: Melody Jane Brown
Represented By: Christina Catoe Bigelow Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: MICHAEL T. BRAXTON
Represented By: Michael T. Braxton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?