Eugene Patterson v. Bryan Stirling
Petitioner / Appellant: EUGENE PATTERSON
Respondent / Appellee: BRYAN STIRLING, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections and SCOTT LEWIS, Warden, Perry Correctional Institution
Case Number: 21-6406
Filed: March 18, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 1, 2022 Eugene Patterson v. Bryan Stirling

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2021 Filing 9 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Eugene Patterson. [21-6406] Elizabeth Franklin-Best [Entered: 04/24/2021 09:41 AM]
April 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 7 ] Number of days granted: 14. Informal Opening Brief due 04/26/2021. Copies to all parties. [1000935197] [21-6406] DL [Entered: 04/16/2021 09:56 AM]
April 16, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION by Eugene Patterson to extend filing time for informal opening brief until May 5, 2021.. Date and method of service: 04/16/2021 Courier delivery, ecf, US mail. [1000935165] [21-6406] Elizabeth Franklin-Best [Entered: 04/16/2021 09:28 AM]
March 24, 2021 Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Melody J. Brown for Scott Lewis and Bryan Stirling. [1000922013] [21-6406] Melody Brown [Entered: 03/24/2021 09:31 AM]
March 23, 2021 Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL for Eugene Patterson. [1000921052] [21-6406] Elizabeth Franklin-Best [Entered: 03/23/2021 09:55 AM]
March 22, 2021 Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 4:19-cv-03032-JD. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case? No. [21-6406] DL [Entered: 03/22/2021 08:28 AM]
March 18, 2021 Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 04/01/2021. [21-6406] CP [Entered: 03/18/2021 03:55 PM]
March 18, 2021 Filing 2 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Eugene Patterson. Informal Opening Brief due 04/12/2021 [21-6406] CP [Entered: 03/18/2021 03:46 PM]
March 18, 2021 Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 4:19-cv-03032-JD. Date notice of appeal filed: 03/16/2021. Case manager: CPoulsen. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [21-6406] CP [Entered: 03/18/2021 01:09 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Eugene Patterson v. Bryan Stirling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: EUGENE PATTERSON
Represented By: Elizabeth Anne Franklin-Best
Represented By: Eugene Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: BRYAN STIRLING, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections
Represented By: Melody Jane Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SCOTT LEWIS, Warden, Perry Correctional Institution
Represented By: Melody Jane Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?