US v. Marricco Sykes
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
MARRICCO SYKES |
21-6421 |
March 22, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 COURT ORDER filed granting Motion for abeyance [ # 11 ] Case 21-6421 placed in abeyance pending decision in 20-7797 from current appellate court. Copies to all parties. [1000938076] [21-6421] TF [Entered: 04/21/2021 03:15 PM] |
Filing 13 ORDER filed granting Motion to suspend [ # 11 ] Copies to all parties. [1000926109] [21-6421] TF [Entered: 03/31/2021 08:55 AM] |
Filing 12 RESPONSE/ANSWER by Marricco Sykes to Motion [ # 11 ], Motion [ # 11 ]. Nature of response: in opposition. [21-6421] Jennifer Leisten [Entered: 03/30/2021 01:49 PM] |
Filing 11 MOTION by US to place case in abeyance. , to suspend Briefing Schedule. Date and method of service: 03/30/2021 ecf. [1000925618] [21-6421] Genna Petre [Entered: 03/30/2021 12:08 PM] |
Filing 10 RESPONSE/ANSWER by US to Motion to accelerate case processing [ # 8 ], Motion to expedite decision [ # 8 ]. Nature of response: in opposition. [21-6421] Genna Petre [Entered: 03/30/2021 12:04 PM] |
Filing 9 NOTICE ISSUED to US requesting response to Motion to accelerate case processing [ # 8 ]Response due: 03/30/2021.[1000923036]. [21-6421] TF [Entered: 03/25/2021 01:18 PM] |
Filing 8 MOTION by Marricco Sykes to accelerate case processing, to expedite decision. Date and method of service: 03/25/2021 ecf.[1000923012][1000923012] [21-6421]. Jennifer Leisten [Entered: 03/25/2021 12:56 PM] |
Filing 7 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Opening Brief and Appendix due 05/03/2021. Response Brief due 06/02/2021 [21-6421] TF [Entered: 03/23/2021 10:02 AM] |
Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Genna D. Petre for US. [1000920848] [21-6421] Genna Petre [Entered: 03/23/2021 07:59 AM] |
Filing 5 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Marricco Sykes. [21-6421] Jennifer Leisten [Entered: 03/22/2021 09:47 PM] |
Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Jennifer C. Leisten for Marricco Sykes. [1000920756] [21-6421] Jennifer Leisten [Entered: 03/22/2021 09:45 PM] |
Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case Originating case number: 5:19-hc-02304-BR. [21-6421] TF [Entered: 03/22/2021 02:09 PM] |
Filing 2 ORDER filed appointing/assigning counsel. Federal Public Defender for Marricco Sykes in 21-6421. Copies to all parties. [1000920472] [21-6421] TF [Entered: 03/22/2021 02:05 PM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:19-hc-02304-BR. Case manager: TFischer. [21-6421] TF [Entered: 03/22/2021 01:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: US v. Marricco Sykes | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MARRICCO SYKES | |
Represented By: | Jennifer Claire Leisten |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Genna Danelle Petre |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.