Duane Berry v. United States Department of Treasury
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY |
| DUANE LETROY BERRY, by and through Federal Trustee, Duane L. Berry |
| 21-6497 |
| March 31, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER filed deferring action on Motion for stay pending appeal filed by Appellant Duane Letroy Berry [ # 10 ] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Berry. [1000953852] [21-6497] AW [Entered: 05/18/2021 03:48 PM]
|
| Filing 10 MOTION by Duane Letroy Berry in 21-6465, 21-6497 for stay pending appeal. [1000952995] [21-6465, 21-6497] AW [Entered: 05/17/2021 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 9 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Duane Letroy Berry re: failure to satisfy fee and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Berry. [21-6497] AW [Entered: 05/12/2021 08:20 AM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER filed deferring action on Motion to amend/correct filed by Appellant Duane Letroy Berry [ # 7 ] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Berry. [1000945361] [21-6497] AW [Entered: 05/04/2021 10:23 AM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION by Duane Letroy Berry to amend/correct caption. [1000945360] [21-6497] AW [Entered: 05/04/2021 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 6 Notice issued re: motion requesting order for district court to forward the record deemed moot. Mailed to: Duane Letroy Berry FMC BUTNER FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER P. O. Box 1600 Butner, NC 27509-0000. [21-6497] AB [Entered: 04/23/2021 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Duane Letroy Berry requesting order for district court to forward the record. Date and method of service: 04/09/2021 US mail. [1000939733] [21-6497] AB [Entered: 04/23/2021 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:21-cv-00029-KDB-DCK. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [21-6497] AW [Entered: 03/31/2021 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Berry. Informal Opening Brief due 04/26/2021 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [21-6497] AW [Entered: 03/31/2021 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Duane Letroy Berry - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 04/30/2021 Originating case number: 5:21-cv-00029-KDB-DCK. Mailed to: Duane Berry. [21-6497] AW [Entered: 03/31/2021 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:21-cv-00029-KDB-DCK. Case manager: AWalker. [21-6497] AW [Entered: 03/31/2021 11:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Duane Berry v. United States Department of Treasury | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: DUANE LETROY BERRY, by and through Federal Trustee, Duane L. Berry | |
| Represented By: | Duane Letroy Berry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
