Richard White v. Donald Ames
| DONALD F. AMES, Superintendent |
| RICHARD A. WHITE |
| 21-6779 |
| May 18, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Richard A. White. [21-6779] MR [Entered: 07/06/2021 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE ISSUED re: misrouted fee received/transmitted to WV Southern District in paper form. Amount: $505.00. Mailed to: Richard A. White, #3484792 Correctional Complex - Mount Olive 1 Mountainside Way Mt. Olive, WV 25185. [21-6779] BAW [Entered: 06/30/2021 11:16 AM] |
Filing 10
ORDER filed granting aplication to proceed in forma pauperis [9]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: appellant. [1000971902] [21-6779] MR [Entered: 06/21/2021 02:13 PM]
|
| Filing 9 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Richard A. White. [21-6779] MR [Entered: 06/21/2021 02:12 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER filed granting motion to extend filing time [ # 7 ]. Number of days granted: 21., Informal Opening Brief due 07/02/2021. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: appellant. [1000966199] [21-6779] MR [Entered: 06/09/2021 10:05 AM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION by Richard A. White to extend filing time for informal opening brief until 07/11/2021.. Date and method of service: 06/01/2021 US mail. [1000965954] [21-6779] MR [Entered: 06/08/2021 10:30 PM] |
| Filing 6 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 2:19-cv-00121. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case? N/A. [21-6779] MR [Entered: 05/20/2021 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Lindsay S. See for Donald F. Ames. [1000953882] [21-6779] Lindsay See [Entered: 05/18/2021 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: appellant. Informal Opening Brief due 06/11/2021 [21-6779] MR [Entered: 05/18/2021 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to Richard A. White - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 06/17/2021 Originating case number: 2:19-cv-00121. Mailed to: appellant. [21-6779] MR [Entered: 05/18/2021 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 06/01/2021. [21-6779] MR [Entered: 05/18/2021 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 2:19-cv-00121. Date notice of appeal filed: 04/30/2021. Case manager: MRadday. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [21-6779] MR [Entered: 05/18/2021 01:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Richard White v. Donald Ames | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: DONALD F. AMES, Superintendent | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin F. Yancey III |
| Represented By: | Lindsay Sara See |
| Represented By: | Karen C. Villanueva-Matkovich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: RICHARD A. WHITE | |
| Represented By: | Richard A. White |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
