Steve Audette v. Dr. Nogo
| REID, Nurse, NURSE PATTERSON, NOGO, Dr. and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHNSON |
| STEVE AUDETTE |
| 21-6902 |
| June 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 INFORMAL RESPONSE BRIEF by Nogo. [21-6902] Michael James [Entered: 07/07/2021 04:28 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER filed granting Motion for leave to proceed PLRA [7] Fee Amount: $505.00. Name and Prisoner Number: Steven Audette, #47584-074. Copies to all parties.. [1000978325] [21-6902] CT [Entered: 07/01/2021 10:31 AM]
|
| Filing 7 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Steve Audette. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: No. [21-6902] CT [Entered: 06/29/2021 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Steve Audette. [21-6902] CT [Entered: 06/22/2021 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:17-ct-03094-FL. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [21-6902] CT [Entered: 06/09/2021 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Informal Opening Brief due 07/06/2021. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [21-6902] CT [Entered: 06/09/2021 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 3 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Steve Audette ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days.. [21-6902] CT [Entered: 06/09/2021 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:17-ct-03094-FL. Case manager: CathyHerb. [21-6902] CT [Entered: 06/09/2021 12:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
