Osbaldo Berrios v. Rene Sandler
OSBALDO LEMUS BERRIOS |
RENE SANDLER and SANDLER & MERCER, P.C. |
21-6936 |
June 17, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 PLRA-CONSENT TO PAYMENT form by Osbaldo Lemus Berrios. [21-6936] AW [Entered: 08/13/2021 03:48 PM] |
Filing 8 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Osbaldo Lemus Berrios. [21-6936] AW [Entered: 08/13/2021 03:43 PM] |
![]() |
Filing 6 MOTION by Osbaldo Lemus Berrios in 21-6931, 21-6856, 21-6934, 21-6936 to extend filing time for informal opening brief and PLRA documents. [1000992040] [21-6931, 21-6856, 21-6934, 21-6936] AW [Entered: 07/26/2021 04:03 PM] |
Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 8:20-cv-03192-TDC. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [21-6936] AW [Entered: 06/21/2021 07:52 AM] |
Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 07/01/2021. [21-6936] AW [Entered: 06/17/2021 09:06 AM] |
Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Berrios. Informal Opening Brief due 07/12/2021 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [21-6936] AW [Entered: 06/17/2021 08:59 AM] |
Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Osbaldo Lemus Berrios ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Berrios. [21-6936] AW [Entered: 06/17/2021 08:55 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 8:20-cv-03192-TDC. Case manager: AWalker. [21-6936] AW [Entered: 06/17/2021 08:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.