Marcus Dixon v. Director of Department of Corrections
| MARCUS LE'SHAWN DIXON |
| DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 21-7016 |
| July 7, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Marcus Dixon v. Director of Department of Corr |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER filed denying as moot Motion to extend filing time [ # 12 ] Copies to all parties. [1000998741] [21-7016] CT [Entered: 08/05/2021 02:19 PM]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION by Marcus Le'Shawn Dixon to extend filing time for payment of fee/filing of IFP application. Date and method of service: 07/28/2021 US mail. [1000998736] [21-7016] CT [Entered: 08/05/2021 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 11 DOCUMENT - titled motion and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis - by Marcus Le'Shawn Dixon. [1000997739] [21-7016] CT [Entered: 08/04/2021 02:21 PM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [8] Copies to all parties. [1000997093] [21-7016] CT [Entered: 08/03/2021 03:51 PM]
|
| Filing 9 CHANGE OF ADDRESS Notice by Marcus Le'Shawn Dixon. [21-7016] CT [Entered: 08/03/2021 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 8 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Marcus Le'Shawn Dixon. [21-7016] CT [Entered: 08/03/2021 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to [ # 5 ] Motion for certificate of appealability by Marcus Le'Shawn Dixon. [1000997048] [21-7016] CT [Entered: 08/03/2021 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Marcus Le'Shawn Dixon. [21-7016] CT [Entered: 08/03/2021 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Marcus Le'Shawn Dixon for certificate of appealability. Date and method of service: 07/21/2021 US mail. [1000994291] [21-7016] CT [Entered: 07/29/2021 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 3:21-cv-00114-HEH. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? No. State court paper record requested in 2254 case? No. [21-7016] CT [Entered: 07/07/2021 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: M. Dixon. Informal Opening Brief due 08/02/2021 [21-7016] CT [Entered: 07/07/2021 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Marcus Le'Shawn Dixon - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 08/06/2021. Originating case number: 3:21-cv-00114-HEH. Mailed to: M. Dixon. [21-7016] CT [Entered: 07/07/2021 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 3:21-cv-00114-HEH. Date notice of appeal filed: 07/01/2021. Case manager: CathyHerb. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [21-7016] CT [Entered: 07/07/2021 03:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Marcus Dixon v. Director of Department of Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: MARCUS LE'SHAWN DIXON | |
| Represented By: | Marcus Le'Shawn Dixon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
