Adam Pelletier v. Marcus Elam
| ADAM PELLETIER |
| MARCUS ELAM, Regional Administrator, BETH CABEL, Warden Sussex II and MR. BROWN, Hearing Officer for Sussex II |
| 21-7043 |
| July 14, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Rule 42(b) mandate issued. Originating case number: 1:20-cv-00524-TSE-MSN. Mailed to: Adam Pelletier. [21-7043] JR [Entered: 08/02/2021 08:19 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER filed granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [ # 6 ]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Adam Pellitier. [1000995442] [21-7043] JR [Entered: 08/02/2021 08:17 AM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION by Adam Pelletier to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [6]. Date and method of service: 07/24/2021 US mail. [1000995441] [21-7043] JR [Entered: 08/02/2021 08:16 AM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:20-cv-00524-TSE-MSN. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [21-7043] JR [Entered: 07/14/2021 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Adam Pelletier. Informal Opening Brief due 08/09/2021. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [21-7043] JR [Entered: 07/14/2021 09:38 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Adam Pelletier ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Adam Pelletier. [21-7043] JR [Entered: 07/14/2021 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:20-cv-00524-TSE-MSN. Case manager: JRice. [21-7043] JR [Entered: 07/14/2021 09:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
