Bobby Shockley v. Sergeant Foster
| BOBBY E. SHOCKLEY |
| SERGEANT FOSTER, Correctional Officer RRJ and SHAWN FROSTER, Sergeant |
| 21-7104 |
| July 26, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Bobby Shockley v. Sergeant Foster |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Bobby E. Shockley. [21-7104] CT [Entered: 08/25/2021 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Philip C. Krone for Sergeant Foster. [1000995856] [21-7104] Philip Krone [Entered: 08/02/2021 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Sergeant Foster. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000995854] [21-7104] Alexander Francuzenko [Entered: 08/02/2021 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Alexander Francuzenko for Sergeant Foster. [1000995850] [21-7104] Alexander Francuzenko [Entered: 08/02/2021 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-00909-RDA-TCB. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [21-7104] CT [Entered: 07/29/2021 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 08/10/2021. [21-7104] CT [Entered: 07/27/2021 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Bobby Shockley. Informal Opening Brief due 08/19/2021. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [21-7104] CT [Entered: 07/26/2021 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-00909-RDA-TCB. Case manager: CathyHerb. [21-7104] CT [Entered: 07/26/2021 01:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
