Destined George v. C.O. Puckett
| DESTINED C. M. D. GEORGE |
| C.O. PUCKETT, sued in individual and official capacity and C.O. OH, sued in individual and official capacity |
| 21-7249 |
| August 30, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Destined C. M. D. George. [21-7249] AW [Entered: 10/20/2021 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 6 PLRA-CONSENT TO PAYMENT form by Destined C. M. D. George. [21-7249] AW [Entered: 10/20/2021 04:01 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 4 ] Number of days granted: 32 Informal Opening Brief due 10/25/2021, updating plra fee requirements PLRA documents due 10/25/2021 Copies to all parties. Mailed to: George. [1001027192] [21-7249] AW [Entered: 09/21/2021 12:34 PM]
|
| Filing 4 MOTION by Destined C. M. D. George to extend filing time for informal opening brief. [1001027186] [21-7249] AW [Entered: 09/21/2021 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: George. Informal Opening Brief due 09/23/2021 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [21-7249] AW [Entered: 08/30/2021 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Destined C. M. D. George ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: George. [21-7249] AW [Entered: 08/30/2021 12:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:19-cv-00846-JPJ-PMS. Case manager: AWalker. [21-7249] AW [Entered: 08/30/2021 12:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
