Joseph McGhee Bey v. US
JOSEPH CASEY MCGHEE BEY |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and UNITED STATES CONGRESS |
21-7364 |
September 24, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:21-cv-00520-WO-LPA. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [21-7364] CT [Entered: 11/09/2021 01:43 PM] |
Filing 7 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Joseph Casey McGhee Bey re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. [21-7364] CT [Entered: 11/02/2021 12:37 PM] |
Filing 6 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court - second request. Due: 11/16/2021. [21-7364] CT [Entered: 11/02/2021 12:34 PM] |
Filing 5 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Joseph Casey McGhee Bey. [21-7364] CT [Entered: 11/02/2021 11:58 AM] |
Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 10/08/2021. [21-7364] CT [Entered: 09/24/2021 12:42 PM] |
Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Informal Opening Brief due 10/18/2021. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [21-7364] CT [Entered: 09/24/2021 12:38 PM] |
Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Joseph Casey McGhee Bey ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. [21-7364] CT [Entered: 09/24/2021 12:35 PM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:21-cv-00520-WO-LPA. Case manager: CathyHerb. [21-7364] CT [Entered: 09/24/2021 12:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.