Omeako Brisbon v. Eric Hooks
| STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, WARDEN J. SAPPER, VICTOR LOCKLEAR and WARDEN JOHN HERRING |
| OMEAKO L. BRISBON |
| ERIC HOOKS |
| 21-7508 |
| October 26, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [6]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Omeako Brisbon. [1001065078] [21-7508] CB [Entered: 11/24/2021 09:59 AM]
|
| Filing 6 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Omeako L. Brisbon. [21-7508] CB [Entered: 11/24/2021 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 5 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Omeako L. Brisbon. [21-7508] CB [Entered: 11/24/2021 09:57 AM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:20-hc-02211-BO. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case? N/A. [21-7508] CT [Entered: 10/26/2021 11:34 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Informal Opening Brief due 11/19/2021 [21-7508] CT [Entered: 10/26/2021 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Omeako L. Brisbon - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 11/29/2021. Originating case number: 5:20-hc-02211-BO. [21-7508] CT [Entered: 10/26/2021 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 5:20-hc-02211-BO. Date notice of appeal filed: 10/25/2021. Case manager: CathyHerb. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [21-7508] CT [Entered: 10/26/2021 11:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
