Roy Echols, Jr. v. CSX Transportation, Incorporated
| ROY FRANKLIN ECHOLS, JR. |
| CSX TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED |
| 21-7541 |
| November 3, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER filed deferring action on Motion to appoint/assign counsel filed by Appellant Roy Franklin Echols, Jr. [ # 9 ]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Roy Franklin Echols Jr. SUSSEX I STATE PRISON 24414 Musselwhite Drive Waverly, VA 23891-1111. [1001072642] [21-7541] AB [Entered: 12/09/2021 04:43 PM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION by Roy Franklin Echols, Jr. to appoint/assign counsel. Date and method of service: 12/04/2021 US mail. [1001072640] [21-7541] AB [Entered: 12/09/2021 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 8 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Roy Franklin Echols, Jr. re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Roy Franklin Echols Jr. SUSSEX I STATE PRISON 24414 Musselwhite Drive Waverly, VA 23891-1111. [21-7541] AB [Entered: 12/01/2021 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 7 SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. State court record (paper) requested? N/A. [21-7541] AB [Entered: 11/22/2021 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. State court record (paper) requested? N/A. [21-7541] AB [Entered: 11/04/2021 08:38 PM] |
| Filing 5 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Roy Franklin Echols Jr. SUSSEX I STATE PRISON 24414 Musselwhite Drive Waverly, VA 23891-1111. Informal Opening Brief due 11/29/2021. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [21-7541] AB [Entered: 11/03/2021 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Roy Franklin Echols, Jr. ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Roy Franklin Echols Jr. SUSSEX I STATE PRISON 24414 Musselwhite Drive Waverly, VA 23891-1111. [21-7541] AB [Entered: 11/03/2021 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 11/17/2021. [21-7541] AB [Entered: 11/03/2021 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 3:19-cv-00947-REP-EWH. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [21-7541] AB [Entered: 11/03/2021 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:19-cv-00947-REP-EWH. Case manager: ABrownlee. [21-7541] AB [Entered: 11/03/2021 11:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Roy Echols, Jr. v. CSX Transportation, Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: ROY FRANKLIN ECHOLS, JR. | |
| Represented By: | Roy Franklin Echols Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CSX TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
