US v. David Hill
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| DAVID HILL |
| 21-7575 |
| November 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: David Hill. Informal Opening Brief due 12/03/2021. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [21-7575] CB [Entered: 11/09/2021 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1. Case manager: CBennett. Date notice of appeal filed: 11/08/2021. [21-7575] CB [Entered: 11/09/2021 10:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. David Hill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Inayat Delawala |
| Represented By: | Paul Nitze |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: DAVID HILL | |
| Represented By: | David Hill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
