Roberto Arce, Jr. v. Stevie Knight
| MELISSA FORSYTH, Camp Administrator |
| ROBERTO ARCE, JR. |
| STEVIE KNIGHT, Warden |
| 21-7601 |
| November 16, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Roberto Arce, Jr. re: failure to satisfy fee and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Roberto Arce. [21-7601] CH [Entered: 12/28/2021 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL for Stevie Knight. [1001059674] [21-7601] Marshall Prince [Entered: 11/16/2021 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 9:21-cv-00256-DCN. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [21-7601] CH [Entered: 11/16/2021 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Roberto Arce. Informal Opening Brief due 12/10/2021. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [21-7601] CH [Entered: 11/16/2021 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Roberto Arce, Jr. - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 12/16/2021. Originating case number: 9:21-cv-00256-DCN. Mailed to: Roberto Arce. [21-7601] CH [Entered: 11/16/2021 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 9:21-cv-00256-DCN. Date notice of appeal filed: 11/12/2021. Case manager: CHalupa. Did district court rule on COA? N/A. [21-7601] CH [Entered: 11/16/2021 09:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
