John Crandell, III v. Hardy County Rural Development Authority
| JOHN OSBORNE CRANDELL, III |
| HARDY COUNTY RURAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY |
| 22-1003 |
| January 3, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Real Property Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| John Crandell, III v. Hardy County Rural Development Authority |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 INFORMAL REPLY BRIEF by Mr. John Osborne Crandell, III. [1001111981] [22-1003] John Crandell [Entered: 02/16/2022 11:02 PM] |
| Filing 11 INFORMAL RESPONSE BRIEF by Hardy County Rural Development Authority. [1001105747] [22-1003] Peter Zurbuch [Entered: 02/07/2022 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Peter G. Zurbuch for Hardy County Rural Development Authority. [1001105742] [22-1003] Peter Zurbuch [Entered: 02/07/2022 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Robert C. Chenoweth for Hardy County Rural Development Authority. [1001105734] [22-1003] Robert Chenoweth [Entered: 02/07/2022 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mr. John Osborne Crandell, III. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001098505] [22-1003] John Crandell [Entered: 01/25/2022 05:17 PM] |
| Filing 7 DOCKETING FORMS FOLLOW-UP NOTICE ISSUED to John Osborne Crandell, III re: filing of disclosure form. Disclosure statement due from John Osborne Crandell III on 01/28/2022. [1001097986] [22-1003] JSN [Entered: 01/25/2022 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Mr. John Osborne Crandell, III. [1001097494] [22-1003] John Crandell [Entered: 01/24/2022 11:12 PM] |
| Filing 5 Notice issued re: deemed moot. [1001091226] [22-1003] JSN [Entered: 01/12/2022 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Mr. John Osborne Crandell, III for leave to file electronically. Date and method of service: 01/10/2022 US mail. [1001091208] [22-1003] JSN [Entered: 01/12/2022 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 3 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 2:18-cv-00087-MJA. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001084022] [22-1003] JSN [Entered: 01/03/2022 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. [1001084017] Informal Opening Brief due 01/27/2022. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-1003] JSN [Entered: 01/03/2022 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 2:18-cv-00087-MJA. Case manager: JeffNeal. [1001084015] [22-1003] JSN [Entered: 01/03/2022 10:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: John Crandell, III v. Hardy County Rural Development Authority | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JOHN OSBORNE CRANDELL, III | |
| Represented By: | John Osborne Crandell III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: HARDY COUNTY RURAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY | |
| Represented By: | Robert Clee Chenoweth |
| Represented By: | Peter G. Zurbuch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.