Anthony Whyte v. Merrick Garland
| ANTHONY KEMMOY WHYTE |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General |
| 22-1032 |
| January 10, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER filed for temporary administrative stay. Response due: 01/18/2022. Copies to all parties. [1001089457] [22-1032] RHS [Entered: 01/10/2022 03:43 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Emergency MOTION by Anthony Kemmoy Whyte for stay pending appeal.. Date and method of service: 01/10/2022 ecf. [1001089274] [22-1032] Amber Qureshi [Entered: 01/10/2022 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Anthony Kemmoy Whyte. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001089254] [22-1032] Amber Qureshi [Entered: 01/10/2022 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Giovanni B. Di Maggio for Merrick B. Garland. [1001088873] [22-1032] Giovanni Di Maggio [Entered: 01/10/2022 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record from Merrick B. Garland. Date petition for review or application filed: 01/08/2022. [ # 1 ] petition for review. [1001088804] Administrative Record due 02/22/2022 [22-1032] RHS [Entered: 01/10/2022 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] petition for review Originating case number: A216-887-943.. [1001088803] [22-1032] RHS [Entered: 01/10/2022 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 1 Petition for review of agency order filed by Anthony Kemmoy Whyte .[1001088801] [22-1032] RHS [Entered: 01/10/2022 09:04 AM] |
| Immigration Petition for Review case docketed. Originating case number: A216-887-943. Case manager: RSewell. [1001088786] [22-1032] RHS [Entered: 01/10/2022 08:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
