Tonia Windham v. Medical University of South Carolina
| DOROTHY SIMMONS, WENDY VAN HORN SHAFFER, ESTHER RACHEL MILLER and DEBRA ANN UNDERWOOD |
| MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY |
| TONIA WINDHAM |
| MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA |
| 22-1058 |
| January 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER filed updating briefing order deadlines. Opening brief and appendix due 05/02/2022. Response brief due 06/16/2022. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties. [1001126122] [22-1058] MEB [Entered: 03/11/2022 02:06 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER filed updating briefing order deadlines. Opening brief and appendix due 04/04/2022. Response brief due 05/04/2022. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties. [1001111649] [22-1058] MEB [Entered: 02/16/2022 01:06 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER filed extending filing time for opening brief and appendix until March 18, 2022. Number of days granted: 4. Opening brief and appendix due 03/18/2022. Response brief due 04/18/2022. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties. [1001109106] [22-1058] TW [Entered: 02/11/2022 03:37 PM]
|
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Elizabeth F. Nicholson for Tonia Windham. [1001103745] [22-1058] Elizabeth Nicholson [Entered: 02/03/2022 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 9 Initial mediation conference scheduled. [1001103059] [22-1058] LHP [Entered: 02/02/2022 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 8 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. [1001102898] Opening Brief and Appendix due 03/14/2022. Response Brief due 04/13/2022. [22-1058] MEB [Entered: 02/02/2022 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tonia Windham. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001102853] [22-1058] James Bruorton [Entered: 02/02/2022 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 6 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Tonia Windham.. [1001102491] [22-1058] James Bruorton [Entered: 02/01/2022 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by James A. Bruorton, IV for Tonia Windham. [1001100808] [22-1058] James Bruorton [Entered: 01/31/2022 08:48 AM] |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Medical University of South Carolina. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001096915] [22-1058] John Fletcher [Entered: 01/24/2022 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by M. Dawes Cooke, Jr. and John W. Fletcher for Medical University of South Carolina. [1001096910] [22-1058] John Fletcher [Entered: 01/24/2022 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 2:19-cv-01306-RMG. Mailed to: Elizabeth Foy Nicholson, ROSEN HAGOOD, LLC., Suite 400, 151 Meeting Street, P. O. Box 893, Charleston, SC 29402. [1001093354] [22-1058] MEB [Entered: 01/18/2022 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 2:19-cv-01306-RMG. Case manager: MBeall. [1001093304] [22-1058] MEB [Entered: 01/18/2022 09:04 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
