Anthony Zappin v. Rachael Fletcher Cipoletti
| AUSTIN ZAPPIN and ANTHONY ZAPPIN |
| RACHAEL L. FLETCHER CIPOLETTI, JUSTICE EVAN JENKINS, JUSTICE BETH WALKER, JUSTICE BILL WOOTEN, JUSTICE TIM ARMSTEAD, JUSTICE JOHN HUTCHINSON, EDYTHE GAISER, ANNE LAMBRIGHT and GAIL HENDERSON STAPLES |
| 22-1065 |
| January 19, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Anthony Zappin v. Rachael Fletcher Cipoletti |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER filed denying Motion to dismiss appeal for failure to prosecute [ # 6 ] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Anthony Zappin. [1001126129] [22-1065] KH [Entered: 03/11/2022 02:11 PM]
|
| Filing 14 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 2:21-cv-00119. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001125691] [22-1065] KH [Entered: 03/11/2022 09:23 AM] |
| Filing 13 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001123854]. Due: 03/22/2022. [22-1065] KH [Entered: 03/08/2022 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 12 DOCKETING FORMS FOLLOW-UP NOTICE ISSUED to Anthony Zappin re: filing of disclosure form. Mailed to: Anthony Zappin. [1001123842] [22-1065] KH [Entered: 03/08/2022 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE/ANSWER by Anthony Zappin to Motion to dismiss appeal for failure to prosecute [ # 6 ]. Nature of response: in opposition. [1001123831] [22-1065] KH [Entered: 03/08/2022 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 9 Notice issued re: corrected case information. Mailed to: Anthony Zappin. [1001123804] [22-1065] KH [Entered: 03/08/2022 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 10 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Anthony Zappin. [1001123825] [22-1065] KH [Entered: 03/08/2022 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE ISSUED to Austin Zappin requesting response to Motion to dismiss appeal for failure to prosecute [ # 6 ] Response due 03/07/2022.[1001113735]. Mailed to: Austin Zappin. [22-1065] KH [Entered: 02/18/2022 06:39 PM] |
| Filing 7 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Austin Zappin re: failure to file informal brief. Mailed to: Austin Zappin. [1001113733] [22-1065] KH [Entered: 02/18/2022 06:35 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Tim Armstead, Rachael L. Fletcher Cipoletti, Edythe Gaiser, John Hutchinson, Evan Jenkins, Anne Lambright, Gail Henderson Staples, Beth Walker and Bill Wooten to dismiss appeal for failure to prosecute. Date and method of service: 02/18/2022 US mail. [1001113449] [22-1065] Ancil Ramey [Entered: 02/18/2022 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 5 DOCKETING FORMS FOLLOW-UP NOTICE ISSUED to Austin Zappin re: filing of disclosure form. Mailed to: Austin Zappin. [1001108763] [22-1065] KH [Entered: 02/11/2022 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tim Armstead, Rachael L. Fletcher Cipoletti, Edythe Gaiser, John Hutchinson, Evan Jenkins, Anne Lambright, Gail Henderson Staples, Beth Walker and Bill Wooten. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001095339] [22-1065] Ancil Ramey [Entered: 01/20/2022 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Ancil G. Ramey for Tim Armstead, Rachael L. Fletcher Cipoletti, Edythe Gaiser, Bill Wooten, John Hutchinson, Evan Jenkins, Anne Lambright, Gail Henderson Staples and Beth Walker. [1001095338] [22-1065] Ancil Ramey [Entered: 01/20/2022 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Austin Zappin 1827 Washington Boulevard Huntington, WV 25701. [1001094879] Informal Opening Brief due 02/14/2022 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-1065] KH [Entered: 01/19/2022 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 2:21-cv-00119. Case manager: KHancock. [1001094836] [22-1065] KH [Entered: 01/19/2022 04:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
