US v. Constantin Kotzev
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| CONSTANTIN KOTZEV, ANGELIKA DOROTA CHYLA and GEORGE KONSTANTY CHYLA |
| 22-1177 |
| February 24, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER filed extending briefing order deadlines. Opening brief and appendix due 05/20/2022. Response brief due 06/21/2022. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties. [1001145472] [22-1177] AW [Entered: 04/13/2022 04:05 PM]
|
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Robert J. Wille (lead counsel) for US. [1001132373] [22-1177] Robert Wille [Entered: 03/22/2022 04:07 PM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER filed updating briefing order deadlines. Opening brief and appendix due 04/29/2022. Response brief due 05/31/2022. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties. [1001130021] [22-1177] AW [Entered: 03/17/2022 04:08 PM]
|
| Filing 12 Initial mediation conference scheduled. [1001126305] [22-1177] LHP [Entered: 03/11/2022 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 11 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. [1001125308] Opening Brief and Appendix due 04/19/2022. Response Brief due 05/19/2022 [22-1177] AW [Entered: 03/10/2022 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Zenia Memon for Angelika Dorota Chyla, George Konstanty Chyla and Constantin Kotzev. [1001125195] [22-1177] Zenia Memon [Entered: 03/10/2022 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Christopher M. Ferguson for Angelika Dorota Chyla, George Konstanty Chyla and Constantin Kotzev. [1001125194] [22-1177] Christopher Ferguson [Entered: 03/10/2022 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by George Konstanty Chyla. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001125189] [22-1177] Jay Nanavati [Entered: 03/10/2022 01:03 PM] |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Angelika Dorota Chyla. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001125188] [22-1177] Jay Nanavati [Entered: 03/10/2022 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Constantin Kotzev. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001125186] [22-1177] Jay Nanavati [Entered: 03/10/2022 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 5 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Angelika Dorota Chyla, George Konstanty Chyla and Constantin Kotzev.. [1001125184] [22-1177] Jay Nanavati [Entered: 03/10/2022 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Jay Nanavati for Angelika Dorota Chyla, George Konstanty Chyla and Constantin Kotzev. [1001125182] [22-1177] Jay Nanavati [Entered: 03/10/2022 12:59 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Geoffrey J. Klimas (lead-counsel) for US. [1001124746] [22-1177] Geoffrey Klimas [Entered: 03/09/2022 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 1:18-cv-01409-TSE-IDD. Mailed to: Nanavati. [1001116307] [22-1177] AW [Entered: 02/24/2022 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:18-cv-01409-TSE-IDD. Case manager: AWalker. [1001116287] [22-1177] AW [Entered: 02/24/2022 10:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
