John Curran, III v. US
| JOHN F. CURRAN, III |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and TAMMY R. TITCHENELL |
| 22-1206 |
| March 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 5 ] Number of days granted: 35. Informal Opening Brief and Filing Fee/IFP due 05/02/2022. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Curran. [1001127497] [22-1206] AW [Entered: 03/14/2022 05:05 PM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION by John F. Curran, III to extend filing time for informal opening brief. [1001127492] [22-1206] AW [Entered: 03/14/2022 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Curran. [1001120092] Informal Opening Brief due 03/28/2022 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-1206] AW [Entered: 03/02/2022 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to John Francis Curran, III - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 04/01/2022 Originating case number: 1:20-cv-00262-JPB-JPM. Mailed to: Curran. [1001120088] [22-1206] AW [Entered: 03/02/2022 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:20-cv-00262-JPB-JPM. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001120085] [22-1206] AW [Entered: 03/02/2022 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:20-cv-00262-JPB-JPM. Case manager: AWalker. [1001120077] [22-1206] AW [Entered: 03/02/2022 10:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
