In re: Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey
| In re: (CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY |
| 22-1246 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus. Originating case number: 5:22-mc-00019. Mailed to: Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbe. [1001124384] [22-1246] RJL [Entered: 03/09/2022 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 3 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Fee or PLRA documents due 03/24/2022. Mailed to: Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey. [1001124379] [22-1246] RJL [Entered: 03/09/2022 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey. [1001124378] [22-1246] RJL [Entered: 03/09/2022 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:22-mc-00019. Case manager: RachelLee. [1001124366] [22-1246] RJL [Entered: 03/09/2022 12:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: In re: (CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY | |
| Represented By: | Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
