In re: Ronald McClary
In re: RONALD MCCLARY |
22-1314 |
March 24, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Docket correction requested from Ronald McClary. Mailed to: Ronald McClary. [1001133431] [22-1314] CH [Entered: 03/24/2022 10:22 AM] |
Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus Originating case number: 5:19-cv-00016-GCM. Mailed to: Ronald McClary. [1001133426] [22-1314] CH [Entered: 03/24/2022 10:12 AM] |
Filing 3 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Ronald McClary]. Fee due to Court of Appeals or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Ronald McClary. [1001133422] [22-1314]--[Edited 03/24/2022 by CH--modify docket text] CH [Entered: 03/24/2022 10:08 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:19-cv-00016-GCM. Case manager: CHalupa. [1001133402] [22-1314] CH [Entered: 03/24/2022 09:59 AM] |
Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Ronald McClary. [1001133418] [22-1314] CH [Entered: 03/24/2022 10:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Ronald McClary | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: RONALD MCCLARY | |
Represented By: | Ronald McClary |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.