Kevin Fonseca v. I.B.T Teamsters Local Union 71
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEVIN FONSECA and KEVIN PETER FONSECA
Defendant / Appellee: I.B.T TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 71 and ERNEST WRENN
Case Number: 22-1534
Filed: May 11, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Labor/Management Relations Act
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2022 Filing 9 INFORMAL REPLY BRIEF by Kevin Peter Fonseca. [1001186668] [22-1534] Kevin Fonseca [Entered: 06/30/2022 06:52 PM]
June 20, 2022 Filing 8 INFORMAL RESPONSE BRIEF by I.B.T Teamsters Local Union 71 and Ernest Wrenn. [1001179984] [22-1534] Trisha Pande [Entered: 06/20/2022 04:15 PM]
June 6, 2022 Filing 7 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Kevin Peter Fonseca. [1001173488] [22-1534] Kevin Fonseca [Entered: 06/06/2022 09:33 PM]
May 27, 2022 Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ernest Wrenn. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001169356] [22-1534] Trisha Pande [Entered: 05/27/2022 10:56 AM]
May 27, 2022 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by I.B.T Teamsters Local Union 71. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001169344] [22-1534] Trisha Pande [Entered: 05/27/2022 10:50 AM]
May 27, 2022 Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Trisha Pande for Ernest Wrenn and I.B.T Teamsters Local Union 71. [1001169340] [22-1534] Trisha Pande [Entered: 05/27/2022 10:49 AM]
May 16, 2022 Filing 3 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 3:21-cv-00369-MOC-DCK. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001162832] [22-1534] MEB [Entered: 05/16/2022 12:41 PM]
May 11, 2022 Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Kevin Fonseca. [1001160523] Informal Opening Brief due 06/06/2022. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-1534] MEB [Entered: 05/11/2022 09:59 AM]
May 11, 2022 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:21-cv-00369-MOC-DCK. Case manager: MBeall. [1001160521] [22-1534] MEB [Entered: 05/11/2022 09:57 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kevin Fonseca v. I.B.T Teamsters Local Union 71
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: KEVIN FONSECA
Represented By: Kevin Fonseca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: KEVIN PETER FONSECA
Represented By: Kevin Peter Fonseca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: I.B.T TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 71
Represented By: Trisha Suzanne Pande
Represented By: James Francis Wallington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ERNEST WRENN
Represented By: Trisha Suzanne Pande
Represented By: James Francis Wallington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?