Rene Merswin v. Mark Esper
| RENE MERSWIN and RENE SAWANIE MERSWIN |
| MARK T. ESPER, Secretary of Defense, JAMES E. MCPHERSON, Secretary of the Navy, CINDY WHITMAN LACY, Director of Business and Support Services Division, JANET DHILLON, Chair of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 22-1631 |
| June 9, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 INFORMAL REPLY BRIEF by Rene Sawanie Merswin. [1001198751] [22-1631] Rene Merswin [Entered: 07/22/2022 12:50 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Janet Dhillon, Mark T. Esper, Cindy Whitman Lacy, James E. McPherson and US that no brief will be filed. [1001194477] [22-1631] Hugham Chan [Entered: 07/15/2022 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Rene Sawanie Merswin. [1001188383] [22-1631] Rene Merswin [Entered: 07/05/2022 06:34 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Merswin. [1001175225] Informal Opening Brief due 07/05/2022 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [22-1631] AW [Entered: 06/09/2022 08:52 AM] |
| Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:20-cv-00548-LO-JFA. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [1001175223] [22-1631] AW [Entered: 06/09/2022 08:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:20-cv-00548-LO-JFA. Case manager: AWalker. [1001175220] [22-1631] AW [Entered: 06/09/2022 08:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
