Marla Hand v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
| MARLA H. HAND and JAMES T. NYESTE |
| SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., a Tennessee Corporation |
| 22-1677 |
| June 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Torts |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Smith & Nephew, Inc.. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? Yes [1001182369] [22-1677] Paul Zidlicky [Entered: 06/23/2022 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Paul J. Zidlicky for Smith & Nephew, Inc.. [1001182367] [22-1677] Paul Zidlicky [Entered: 06/23/2022 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Timothny Daniels, Alex Davis, James Irwin, Douglas Moore, Kim Moore, David Quinn, Ashton Smith, and Jasper Ward. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. [1001181605] Opening Brief and Appendix due 08/01/2022. Response Brief due 08/31/2022. [22-1677] RJL [Entered: 06/22/2022 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00935-CCB. Mailed to: Timothny Daniels, Alex Davis, James Irwin, Douglas Moore, Kim Moore, David Quinn, Ashton Smith, and Jasper Ward. [1001181589] [22-1677] RJL [Entered: 06/22/2022 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00935-CCB. Case manager: RachelLee. [1001181587] [22-1677] RJL [Entered: 06/22/2022 03:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
